Keys to the Successful Indexing of the Archives of Plastic Surgery in Science Citation Index Expanded

109 Editorial Recently, we were invited to attend the workshop for members of the Editorial Board of the Archives of Plastic Surgery (APS) to share our experience of the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) indexing of the Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Mo-tility (impact factor [IF] of 2013, 2.698). The Editor-in-Chief wanted us to review two issues of APS and to comment on them. Through this experience, we assessed the strengths and weaknesses of APS and how to compensate for the weaknesses. APS, the official journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, is published six times a year, every other month. This journal is a peer reviewed and open access journal, the full text of each article is available online, and the articles are required to be written in English. The self-analyzed IF has been estimated at 0.6–0.9 points [1,2]. To our understanding , APS has major strengths. Among the parts of a paper, the abstract part looks very good; it is framed by a colored box, which allows readers to identify it with ease. Likewise, the figures are arranged with appropriate size and with high resolution, drawing readers into the articles. Thanks to the editor's effort, the majority of articles in the past two years of publication were submitted by non-Korean authors. In 2012, only 10 papers were published from 7 countries excluding Korea, while 49 papers were published from 23 countries in 2013 [3]. In addition, open access online has increas ed the accessibility of this journal. However, some parts of the journal require correction in order to continue to build APS to a higher level academic journal. First of all, APS includes case reports and images. Although the impact factor is not an absolute standard for assessing the quality of a journal, many academic journals use the impact factor as an indicator for evaluating the impact of articles. Since case reports and images are less likely to be cited in other journals than original articles and reviews, they play a role in undermining the impact factor of the articles overall. Therefore, APS needs to place greater emphasis on reviews and original articles than case reports and images. Secondly, the fact that the records on research approval have been omitted from many articles of APS is also a matter of general concern. Many academic journals recently have begun to emphasize strict research ethics and require Institutional …